πŸ”­ TelescopePrices

Comparison

NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope vs NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope

The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope's 203mm collects 1.8Γ— the light of the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope's 150mm β€” about 0.7 magnitudes deeper on faint objects, and it splits doubles to 0.57β€³ against 0.77β€³. It costs $720 more.

Spec Celestron NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope Celestron NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope
Best price $1679 OPT $2399 Amazon
Aperture 150 mm 203 mm
$ per mm aperture $11.19 $11.81
TypeCatadioptricCatadioptric
MountGoToGoTo
Focal length 1500 mm 2032 mm
Focal ratio f/10.0 f/10.0
Best for Beginner, Visual, Planetary Visual, Planetary
Amazon β†— Amazon β†—

Amazon listing: NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope β†’ β€œNexStar Evolution 8 WiFi Enabled Computerized Telescope - 8” Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope SCT - Control via Smartphone App - 10-Hour Lithium Battery - iPhone and Android Compatible”

Which one to buy

This is a genuine trade rather than an upgrade. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope gathers 1.8Γ— the light, but at $11.81/mm it's dearer per millimetre than the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope at $11.19/mm. Worth it if you're chasing faint objects, where aperture is the only thing that helps. Harder to justify if you mostly observe the Moon and planets, which are bright enough that the smaller scope shows them well.

What you'd notice at the eyepiece

With the 25mm eyepiece most telescopes ship with, the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope gives 60Γ— and the NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope 81Γ—. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope's longer focal length magnifies harder on planets; the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope shows a wider piece of sky, which is what you want for large nebulae and star clusters, and makes finding things easier. Try other eyepieces β†’

On the Moon and planets

Planets are bright, so this comes down to resolution and how much magnification the optics will carry before the image falls apart. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope resolves to 0.57β€³ and takes about 406Γ—; the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope resolves 0.77β€³ and tops out near 300Γ—. On a night of steady seeing that's a visible difference on Jupiter's belts and the Cassini division. On an average night the atmosphere, not the telescope, sets the limit β€” which is why the gap matters less here than the aperture numbers suggest.

On deep-sky objects

Faint objects are where aperture is the only thing that helps. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope collects 1.8Γ— the light and reaches about 0.7 magnitudes deeper β€” more galaxies within reach, and globular clusters that resolve into stars rather than staying a smudge.

Who each one suits

Both are catadioptric telescopes on the same GoTo mount, so the decision really is just aperture, price and whatever the brand adds around them. Both suit planetary and visual. The NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope is additionally set up for beginner.

Where you can actually buy them

Amazon does not currently sell the NexStar Evolution 6" Computerized Telescope β€” its listing is there but unavailable. OPT has it at $1679. This is normal for brands that sell mainly through astronomy dealers rather than Amazon, and it changes month to month β€” but it's worth knowing before you settle on one.

Which to choose

People also ask

What is the difference between NexStar 6 and 8?
Aperture and price. The NexStar Evolution 8" Computerized Telescope is 203mm against 150mm, so it gathers 1.8Γ— the light, and it costs $720 more.

Questions Google reports people actually asking about this comparison. Answered from our own specs and live prices β€” anything the data can't settle isn't listed rather than guessed at.

What this page can't tell you

Everything above comes from aperture, focal length and price β€” measurable things. It says nothing about how steady the mount is under load, whether the focuser has play, how good the supplied eyepieces are, or what support is like a year in. Those routinely matter more than a few millimetres of aperture, and the only honest source is people who own one.

Worth reading before you buy: owner reports on Cloudy Nights β€” a twenty-year archive of people describing what these actually do at the eyepiece.

Aperture decides light-gathering, so $/mm is the cleanest value measure β€” lower means more telescope per dollar. Compare any other two β†’